We've all heard about climate change and about all of the advocacy groups trying to do something. But are we forgetting what all the facts actually mean? Are we overlooking how to maximize what we can do in our everyday lives in favor of discrediting it and using a minimalist "donate" approach to people we've never met? Are we not all in fact unknowingly living on top of and contributing to an empire of blood?
“The planet has gone through warming periods and ice ages for thousands of years!” However, dumping radioactive poisons, plastic deposits, and other waste materials into waterways, meadows, forests, etc. is simply not good. Synthetically-produced materials are not designed to decompose in nature. The comparison of how the most minute forms of synthetic waste damages an environment compared to a carrying capacity of natural animal waste is measurable.
Imagine smoking in a small room trapped with a deer. The smoking is not exactly a natural function of the room. Eventually, a “carrying capacity” of smoke will be reached. The Earth is not a small room, but the addition of exponential, poisonous wastes into our ecosystems simply has a carrying capacity too. The categories of daily, ongoing waste output beginning from 10 years ago, 50 years ago, 100 years ago, and along longer timelines are immense.
Humidity is basically air with moisture; air that is more “conductive” and uncomfortable because it traps heat: steam particles. Imagine if all of our vehicles and vessels were instead effectively water-powered. How would the Earth’s overall humidity have been affected if we had instead been burning water into vapor for the last 150 years? Water-based combustion systems would supposedly be a very clean way to power the world, right? What are the many results of burning carcinogens into the air.
In my opinion, nature’s greater scheme of the moment seems to be for the eastern and western worlds to abandon their consumption patterns, for they shall not last forever. But can they last long? The Earth’s most prosperous elite are sucking the blood out of the world’s raw materials and labor pool, teaching the ways of waste for blood money, manipulating global economics, blaming the victims. We as the “serf economists” of our respective cultures are not one in the same as the imperial traditions slowly unraveling themselves, believe it or not. We share more with the rest of the “global south” here closer to the bottom. The Marie Antoinette’s of our time cannot place the absurd kind of “undue burdens” that produce the repercussions of decadence on us. For example, the line-of-production waste in electric car manufacturing is beyond counterproductive.
Nevertheless, the high concentration of focus on “sunset” marketing campaigns that shift the burdens from the green industry elsewhere is not always so simple. Plenty of advocacy associations are doing serious, hard work. Plenty are counterproductive. Part of the problem is having so many disorganized groups who aren’t yet working together towards all the other same aims. That is only part of the problem. The science has been long out on what amounts to cause and effect, but we cannot doubt the high level of exploitation of “green tech” by those with the kind of money to afford such well-masked exploits. Inspecting the line of production is a good place to find out what is really going on. Were all of the Earth’s children put here by nature to serve the elite?
Comments